Most Likely Tests to Find Positives
Which tests today are most likely to find evidence of the gluten syndrome?
www.Enterolab.com (research test)
Formerly Immunosciences Labs (New Saliva Home Test and a progressive Complete Antibody Blood Panel*)
Try the diet - Elimination Diet
The explanations below are repeated more than once in several cases.
The only gluten related antibodies for which tests have been developed are:
Deamidated Gliadin - IgA, IgG, IgM (3 separate tests)
Gluteomorphins - IgA, IgG, IgM (3 separate tests)
Gluten - IgA, IgG, IgM (3 separate tests)
Wheat - IgA, IgG, IgM (3 separate tests)
tTG (tissue transglutaminase) - IgA, IgG, IgM
Some researchers believe elevated tTG is not present in all
subsets of the gluten syndrome (see Medical Diagrams)
There are many more known gluten related peptides**
for which no tests are developed.
Here are the main premises reported by Dr. Ken Fine, the researcher/owner of Enterolab.com
- Elevated antibodies may show up in stool before blood.
- HLA DQ 1 and 3 also predispose the gluten syndrome.
- The gluten syndrome is very very prevalent today, in probably over 50% of the population.
- There are several known gluten related antibodies. Patients may react to one and not another. Dr. Vojdani tests for gluteomorphins, gliadin, gluten, and wheat. Tests for other peptides are not yet developed.
- Reactions may occur in several systems, including IgA, IgG and IgM. Dr. Vojdani tests most antibodies for IgA, IgG, and IgM. Most labs do not test IgM at this time.
- There are a number of possible gluten related reactions that do not all include elevated tTG.
- HLA DQ 2 and 8 genes are not always part of these reactions. Therefore he does not believe these genes are necessary for the gluten syndrome to develop. He did not consider the possibility of HLA DQ 1 and 3 in his conclusions.
- Stress, toxins (chemical injury), and infections underlie damage to the gut wall which allows gluten and food particles to pass undigested into the blood stream. The immune system then reacts adversely. IN SHORT, TOXINS AND TOXIC ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES ARE THE MAIN UNDERLYING CAUSE. (Dietrich Klinghardt, MD. believes electrosmog is a significant stressor also.)
- Antibodies to gluten peptides can cross react with foods with a similar molecular structure (milk, egg, corn, yeast, soy, coffee, sesame, and chocolate).
- Antibodies to gluten peptides may cross link by cellular mimicry to tissues all over the body that may "look" even only a little like gluten. This is serious as it may create autoimmunity in many many areas of the body.
- Commercially processed gluten used in combination with other food chemicals can provoke allergic reactions. (Newly published article in the European Journal of Inflammation. Full text available soon.)Elimination diets
Advantages: The elimination diet is inexpensive.
The elimination diet is often definitive.
Disadvantages: Silent damage: May not be immediately helpful for people with
It is conjectured that reperfusion injury (injury related to return of normal blood flow) may account for this reaction.
Another possibility is that the reaction may be related to withdrawal from gluteomorphins. They have an opiate like effect on the brain.
Arguments against formal tests vs. elimination diet:
- Tests are expensive and research tests are often paid out of pocket.
- No test panel is complete enough to be sure to pick up the particular gluten reaction for that patient. However, between Enterolab and Neuroimmunology Labs, there is probably a good chance of a positive result.
- False negative tests are discouraging and may mislead patients or the patient's family and friends not to take the situation seriously. If tests are negative, even if the patient goes gluten free, he/she may not strictly comply or the family may not help. Everyone needs to understand the limits of testing ahead of time. A positive is meaningful. A negative is always inconclusive since gluten can break down into pieces for which there are no tests.
- Some patients may be so ill for so long that their immune systems may be too exhausted to produce elevated antibodies.
Arguments in favor of formal tests vs. elimination diet
- Many patients skip testing and then decide they want to test later after they transition into the diet. They may be tempted to do a gluten challenge which can cause serious damage if they are already completely gluten free. It is best to foresee this possible change of heart and test BEFORE the gluten free diet is started.
- A positive test helps a patient comply in the face of temptation. They have written proof.
- Family especially may be more united and supportive.
- A positive test is proof for young children who later as teens may question their diagnosis in the face of pizza and beer. Late teen and college years are high risk years for development of mental illness. A teen who repeatedly breaks the gluten free diet after years of compliance risks a severe reaction, immediately or eventually. A positive test from their childhood may (or may not!) convince them to stay on the diet. This is also a very good reason to build a child's body and heal the gut wall with healthy nutrient dense food and reduced toxic load before the teen years.
- Is gluten a risky food for anyone today?
- Good question? There is no definite answer.
Is it significant that our wheat was essentially genetically modified, in the early 1900's by a radiation process that is no longer in use today?*
The gluten content was raised dramatically by hybridization.
There are many processes to which wheat is subjected commercially. Research shows some of them to be toxic in combination with food chemicals to some people.
Food and environmental toxins, and toxic fats, are believed by some researchers to damage and weaken the gut wall and allow gluten pieces that are still too big to slip into the blood stream, triggering the gluten syndrome.
Furthermore, some researchers believe electrosmog and emotional stress can trigger the gluten syndrome.
Enterolab reports very high incidences of the gluten syndrome, even though they check only 2 antibodies, but in stool.
Dr. Thomas O'Bryan ran as a "complete as possible" 9-12 gluten antibody blood panel from Neuroimmunology Labs/Immunosciences on every patient he treated for 3 years. The positivity rate was 77% in that sick population. This does not account for many people with silent damage who had not yet sought help.
Is gluten OK for anybody? Conclusion? Good question!!
What do you think???